Odrive is primarily designed to access popular cloud services through a single interface. Try Cryptomator odrive (Windows, macOS, Linux) Dropbox, Google Drive, One Drive, WebDav and local storage are supported. When such a folder is accessed on the system, it is mounted as an external USB drive. All files in this folder are automatically encrypted before being sent to the cloud. The application creates a folder with a password that participates in encryption. Try Boxcryptor Cryptomator (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS)Ĭryptomator encrypts files and their names using AES round-trip encryption and a 256-bit key. On the site, I have not found anywhere exactly how information is encrypted, except that it is End-to-End encryption. To encrypt data, you will need to connect one or more cloud storages, and then simply transfer the file to the application. I talked about Boxcryptor in a separate review. Boxcryptor (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS) Also, there will be no cloud storage, which natively supports End-to-End encryption. Therefore, in this post you will not find VeraCrypt and similar utilities. I want to say right away that we will talk specifically about encryption when working with cloud storages like Google Drive and Dropbox. In this post, I will introduce several applications that automate this task. Not everyone is willing to waste time on this kind of data protection. OS : Windows 8.1 Pro (圆4)ġ66.4 MByte/sec read - 6.7 MByte/sec, 1711.8 IOPS, 0.58 msĩ18.7 kByte/sec write - 603.1 kByte/sec, 150.8 IOPS, 6.Encryption utilities are a special niche for the paranoid. This time I shut down ALL other running programs and apps, including any antivirus and other “offerings”.įor simplicity’s sake here is a copy and paste of the results from CrytalDiskMark6 and from Parkdale for these settings:ĬrystalDiskMark 6.0.2 圆4 © 2007-2018 hiyohiyo I tried with the user defined options for dokany as suggested by you and the results are - worse! Write performance is now only 1/2 of the already minimal speed I got with the default dokany options and the results for CrystalDiskMark6 and Parkdale again are fully in line. Cryptomator is version 1.4.15 and Dodanky is 1. However, since I would rather use Dokany than WebDAV with Cryptomator, I would be much interested to hear if anyone can confirm this slowness also for the latest Cryptomator version? Test : 500 MiB (x3) Īt those write rates, Dokany vaults are completely useless, but the WebDAV rates are pretty good and equal if not even better than those of Boxcryptor. Below are the results from CrystalDiskMark6, which are fully in line with the Parkdale results, which I tested against, mostly for sanity checking reasons: Test type Dokany WebDAV Ratio I checked that (HiDrive) Synchronization was halted in all cases and that the Dokany driver used by Cryptomator was the latest version. My test setup was a Lenovo W540 with 32 GB and a 1TB EVO SSD, Win81 Pro. I am currently testing Cryptomator as an alternative to Boxcryptor Classic (free), which I have been using successfully for years, but which is long past its end of life and besides, it only allows one vault.Īfter I noticed that Cryptomator-Dokany was ~5x slower than Boxcryptor in writing a realistic set of ~5 GB and ~20.000 files (initially, empty vault) I did some tests with CrystalDiskMark6 and the Parkdale speed test mostly comparing Dokany and WebDAV and found that Dokany was lagging WebDAV especially when writing and with a margin of up to 1:36.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |